Marshall & Swift v. BS & a SOFTWARE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Marshall appears to add the suggestion that a mere application for registration entitles a work to § 410(c)'s presumption of validity afforded to works accepted for registration. The court does not read the Copyright Act this way\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).