Skip to main content
· 1/18/1990

Marshall-Silver Construction Company, Inc. And Silver Construction, Inc. v. M. Mark Mendel, Daniel E. Murray, and M. Mark Mendel Ltd.

Citations

  • 894 F.2d 593
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3801
  • 1987 WL 61292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pointing to case-by-case analysis of pattern requirement which considers size and magnitude of fraud as being part of pattern analysis
  • pointing to case-by-case analysis of pattern requirement which considers size and magnitude of fraud as being part of pattern analysis
  • dismissing the RICO claim where the alleged acts occurred on only three occasions within a five day period with no threat of long-term criminal conduct
  • predicate acts that extended for a period of less than seven months were not continuous where there was no threat of repeated criminal conduct
  • predicate acts of mail fraud and extortion to secure money allegedly owed spanning seven months insufficient
  • Barticheck approach entirely consistent with H.J. Inc.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Diamond, Stapleton, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.