Marsha W. Mignott v. Debra A. Segal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[n]othing suggests that, if defendant had objected, the state would have been unable to successfully address the objection and secure admission of the same testimony”
• “[E]vidence is to be considered ‘scientific’ if it ‘implies a grounding in the methods and procedures of science’ and if the jury will perceive it as carrying the ‘persuasive appeal of science.’ ” (Quoting O’Key, 321 Or at 292.)
• “[E]vidence is to be considered ‘scientific’ if it ‘implies a grounding in the methods and procedures of science’ and if the jury will perceive it as carrying the ‘persuasive appeal of science.’ ” (Quoting O’Key, 321 Or at 292.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).