Marsh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering new trial where state asked defendant on cross-examination whether it was true that he bragged to a barmaid about his plans to break into a building in order to steal a safe and then failed to present testimony of barmaid to this effect
• prosecutor should not have been permitted to lay a foundation for impeachment of defendant who had taken stand on his own behalf by inquiring whether he had boasted to a barmaid that he was going to commit a crime where prosecutor did not have such a statement from the barmaid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-20· cited 10×
• Rolle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-11-07· cited 7×
• Thornton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-20· cited 6×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-03· cited 5×
• Shimko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-22· cited 4×
• Harden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-11-29· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Berger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
• Cone v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1953-12-08· cited 17×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1957-10-02· cited 13×