Marsh v. Pullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interference was substantial where “on several occasions plaintiffs or their guests had to maneuver around parked cars to travel down the [easement] or had to request that certain cars be moved to permit passage along the road”
• record showed that “on several occasions plaintiffs or their guests had to maneuver around parked cars to travel down the [easement] or had to request that certain cars be moved to permit passage along the road.”
• remanding to apportion the costs of maintaining the easement
• remanding to apportion the costs of maintaining the easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).