Marsh v. Nordyke & Marmon Co.
Citations
- 2 Monag. 495
- 15 A. 875
- 1888 Pa. LEXIS 806
Syllabus
<p>Where mill-machinery is purchased, with a contract of guaranty that it shall produce a given quantity and quality of flour, defects in the machinery cannot be shown by evidence of the cost of repairs or additions put upon it by one who purchased the mill, with the machinery, from the defendant. Nor by the quality of the product after repairs had been made or after the party to whom the guaranty was made had parted with the mill.</p> <p>Objections to the admission in evidence of depositions, because there is not appended to them a formal jurat, and because one of the interrogatories contained therein was not according to law, will not be considered, where the complainant has not complied with the rules of court, requiring exceptions to such defects to be taken in a certain time and manner.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the extent and manner of that further reconsideration [under article 2] are left to the legislative body and are subject to its rules\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.