Marsh v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in light of a prima facie case of an on-sale bar, the applicant \had the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that such sales were for experimental purposes\
• discussing how the inventor's failure to disclose the experimental nature of his \load sensing piezoelectric transducer\ when he sold it to a customer was fatal to the inventor's experimental-use argument
• on sale bar even though no profit realized because seller failed to communicate its experimental nature
• “Appellant’s failure to communicate to any of the purchasers or prospective purchasers of his device that the sale or offering was for experimental use is fatal to his case.”
• on-sale bar where seller failed to communicate experimental nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).