Marsh v. Edwards Theatres Circuit, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a provision requiring “full and equal access” for the physically handicapped does not require structural modifications
• a provision requiring \full and equal access\ for the physically handicapped does not require structural modifications
• if the legislature had intended an equal access statute to require structural modifications, then the legislative inclusion of structural modification requirements in a different statute would be redundant
• if the legislature had intended an equal access statute to require structural modifications, then the legislative inclusion of structural modification requirements in a different statute would be redundant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).