Marsh-Monsanto v. Clarenbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of conspiracy claims under § 1983 “because the ‘bare allegation of an agreement is insufficient to sustain a conspiracy claim.’”
• affirming dismissal of conspiracy claims under § 1983 “because the ‘bare allegation of an agreement is insufficient to sustain a conspiracy claim.’”
• “[F]ederal courts lack jurisdiction over suits that are essentially appeals from state-court judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).