Seventh Circuit· 9/10/1984
Mars Ketchum v. Jane M. Byrne
Citations
- 740 F.2d 1398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “racial discrimination [may be and has been a] necessary accompaniment of [an] action taken to protect incumbencies”
- stating that 60 percent of voting-age population is reasonably required to ensure minorities a fair opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice
- observing that “many devices employed to preserve incumbencies are necessarily racially discriminatory”
- stating that district courts have discretion “to determine what an appropriate corrective should be based upon analysis of election data, if such data can yield a meaningful and persuasive result”
- recognizing that courts commonly use 60% VAP corrective
- recognizing that courts commonly use 60% VAP corrective
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Cudahy, Kelleher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
110 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottFifth Circuit· 2016-07-20· cited 129×
- Frank McNeil Individually and as Representatives of a Certified Class v. Springfield Park District and Springfield School District No. 186, DefendantsSeventh Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 120×
- Wayne R. Metz v. Transit Mix, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1987-08-28· cited 92×
- Volma Overton, and Ernesto Calderon, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. City of Austin, and Black Citizens Task Force, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1989-05-01· cited 90×
- Charles Wesley and the Natural Rights Center v. David A. Collins, Coordinator of Elections and W.J. Michael Cody, Attorney General of TennesseeSixth Circuit· 1986-06-05· cited 78×
- Jeffers v. ClintonE.D. Arkansas· 1990-01-26· cited 74×
- Armour v. State of OhioN.D. Ohio· 1991-09-27· cited 69×
- David Baird v. The Consolidated City of IndianapolisSeventh Circuit· 1992-09-30· cited 64×
- Hastert v. State Board of ElectionsN.D. Illinois· 1991-11-06· cited 58×
- Romero v. City of PomonaNinth Circuit· 1989-08-24· cited 55×
- Brewer v. HamFifth Circuit· 1989-06-30· cited 50×
- Harper v. City of Chicago HeightsN.D. Illinois· 1993-05-17· cited 46×
- Prosser v. Elections BoardW.D. Wisconsin· 1992-06-02· cited 42×
- Richard Barnett v. Richard M. Daley, and Carole Bialczak, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesSeventh Circuit· 1994-11-02· cited 40×
- Pope v. County of AlbanySecond Circuit· 2012-05-29· cited 37×
- DeGrandy v. WetherellN.D. Florida· 1992-05-29· cited 36×
- Burton Ex Rel. Republican Party v. SheheenD. South Carolina· 1992-05-01· cited 34×
- Judson Edge, Ronald J. Foust, Georgia L. Deriso, David W. Tietjen, and Arthur Watts v. Sumter County School DistrictEleventh Circuit· 1985-11-14· cited 30×
- Williams v. State Board of ElectionsN.D. Illinois· 1988-08-04· cited 30×
- Neal v. ColeburnE.D. Virginia· 1988-06-27· cited 30×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 7,445×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 783×
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 771×
- Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 658×
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1966-04-25· cited 476×
- Rogers v. LodgeSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 451×
- Louisiana v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 443×
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 419×
- Charles F. Zimmer, Stewart Marshall, Intervenor-Appellant v. John J. McKeithenFifth Circuit· 1973-09-12· cited 411×
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 364×
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 363×
- East Carroll Parish School Board v. MarshallSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 336×
- Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 324×
- Roman v. SincockSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 317×
- Escambia County v. McMillanSupreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 172×
- City of Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 127×
- Henry J. Kirksey, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Board of Supervisors of Hinds County, Mississippi, DefendantsFifth Circuit· 1977-07-25· cited 120×
- Gingles v. EdmistenE.D. North Carolina· 1984-04-20· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.