Mars Electronics of N.Y., Inc. v. U.S.A. Direct, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that for corporate veil to be pierced as to each particular transaction when separate sales transactions were at issue, a showing was required that the owner used his control of the corporation “to commit fraud with respect to each and every transaction at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).