Marrs v. Marriott Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employee had no reasonable expectation of privacy in an open office
• “[T]his type of invasion of privacy . . . generally is inapplicable to most areas of the workplace because there can be no liability for observing an employee at work since [s]he is then not in seclusion.” (quotation omitted)
• “[T]his type of invasion of privacy . . . generally is inapplicable to most areas of the workplace because there can be no liability for observing an employee at work since [s]he is then not in seclusion.” (quotation omitted)
• “[T]his type of invasion of privacy . . . generally is inapplicable to most areas of the workplace because there can be no liability for observing an employee at work since [s]he is then not in seclusion.” (quoting Stanley Mazaroff, Maryland Employment Law § 5.4(B)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).