Marrs & Smith Partnership v. D.K. Boyd Oil & Gas Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that legally sufficient evidence of slander of title similarly supported claim for intentional interference with property rights
• noting that Boyd’s tortious interference claim alleged that the Partnership, a third party, interfered with Boyd’s contractual relationships with two other entities
• noting that Boyd’s tortious interference claim alleged that the Partnership, a third party, interfered with Boyd’s contractual relationships with two other entities
• noting that Boyd’s tortious interference claim alleged that the Partnership, a third party, interfered with Boyd’s contractual relationships with two other entities
• plaintiff not entitled to favorable judgment on un-pled cause of action unless tried by consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).