Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 6/30/2006

Marroquin v. Canales

Citations

  • 236 F.R.D. 257
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49348
  • 2006 WL 1892424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the same legal standards apply for assessing the appropriateness of both proceeding as a collective action and providing court approved notice to potential class members”
  • holding that the plaintiffs adequately demonstrated that other unidentified co-workers were similarly situated in part based on one plaintiff's declaration that a group of workers told him that they had worked for multiple weeks without pay
  • “A group of potential plaintiffs are ‘similarly situated’ when they together were victims of a common policy or scheme or plan that violated the law.”
  • \A group of potential plaintiffs are 'similarly situated' when they together were victims of a common policy or scheme or plan that violated the law.\
  • “[P]otential plaintiffs are ‘similarly situated’ when they together were victims of a common policy or scheme or plan that violated the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Marroquin v. Canales

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.