D. Maryland· 6/30/2006
Marroquin v. Canales
Citations
- 236 F.R.D. 257
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49348
- 2006 WL 1892424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the same legal standards apply for assessing the appropriateness of both proceeding as a collective action and providing court approved notice to potential class members”
- holding that the plaintiffs adequately demonstrated that other unidentified co-workers were similarly situated in part based on one plaintiff's declaration that a group of workers told him that they had worked for multiple weeks without pay
- “A group of potential plaintiffs are ‘similarly situated’ when they together were victims of a common policy or scheme or plan that violated the law.”
- \A group of potential plaintiffs are 'similarly situated' when they together were victims of a common policy or scheme or plan that violated the law.\
- “[P]otential plaintiffs are ‘similarly situated’ when they together were victims of a common policy or scheme or plan that violated the law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLCD. Maryland· 2012-04-10· cited 88×
- Quinteros v. Sparkle Cleaning, Inc.D. Maryland· 2008-01-28· cited 62×
- Williams v. LongD. Maryland· 2008-11-07· cited 61×
- Rawls v. Augustine Home Health Care, Inc.D. Maryland· 2007-07-05· cited 44×
- LaFleur v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2014-03-07· cited 22×
- Martinez v. Cargill Meat Solutions, Corp.D. Nebraska· 2009-12-11· cited 17×
- Heath f v. Google LLCN.D. California· 2018-08-01· cited 4×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 1,715×
- Realite v. Ark Restaurants Corp.S.D. New York· 1998-05-15· cited 90×
- Camper v. Home Quality Management Inc.D. Maryland· 2000-09-21· cited 74×
- Jackson v. New York Telephone Co.S.D. New York· 1995-09-22· cited 46×
- D'ANNA v. M/a-com, Inc.D. Maryland· 1995-10-12· cited 43×
- Riojas v. Seal Produce, Inc.S.D. Texas· 1979-03-10· cited 27×
Other cases named Marroquin v. Canales
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.