Skip to main content
· 1/7/2019

Marro v. Caesar's Entm't Operating Co.

Citations

  • 139 S. Ct. 835
  • 202 L. Ed. 2d 581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying, inter alia, \costs for `internal copying' of documents by [prevailing defendant's] counsel produced for discovery\
  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying, inter alia, “costs for ‘internal copying’ of documents by [prevailing defendant’s] counsel produced for discovery”
  • finding that failure to comply with the \absolute[ ] prerequisite\ of the safe harbor provision precludes imposition of sanctions
  • noting that costs for legal research, local transportation, postage, and courier services are part of attorneys’ fees
  • finding that failure to comply with the \absolute[ ] prerequisite\ of the safe harbor provi- sion precludes imposition of sanctions
  • noting that compliance with safe-harbor provision \is absolutely prerequisite\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.