Marriott Corp. v. American Academy of Psychotherapists, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a corporation can in fact avail itself of the attorney/client privilege” and establishing a five-part test with which to determine whether communications from a corporate client to counsel are protected by the privilege
• holding that “a corporation can in fact avail itself of the attorney/client privilege” and establishing a five-part test with which to determine whether communications from a corporate client to counsel are protected by the privilege
• holding that “a corporation can in fact avail itself of the attorney/client privilege” and establishing a five-part test with which to determine whether communications from a corporate client to counsel are protected by the privilege
• recognizing privilege for communications from a corporation’s employee to its in-house counsel
• recognizing privilege for communications from a corporation’s employee to its in-house counsel
• burden on one eeking to exclude evidence under privilege in OCGA § 24-9-21

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).