Marriage of Tuthill v. Tuthill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a remand is not appropriate” when “the findings indicate that the relevant statutory factor[s]” were considered (emphasis added)
• stating that where moving party fails to establish a change in circumstance modification is precluded and the district court need not make findings on other factors addressed in the modification statute
• stating that where moving party fails to establish a change in circumstance modification is precluded and the district court need not make findings on other factors addressed in the modification statute
• stating that, when the moving party failed to show a prerequisite for modifying maintenance, the district court did not need to address other factors in the modification analysis
• stating that, when the moving party failed to show the substantial change in circumstances required for a modification of maintenance, the district court did not need to make findings on other factors listed in the modification statute
• stating, in the context of a maintenance modification motion, that once the district court found a lack of substantially changed circumstances, a failure to make findings on other maintenance factors did not constitute reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).