Skip to main content
· 1/13/1988

Marriage of Schinner v. Schinner

Citations

  • 420 N.W.2d 381
  • 143 Wis. 2d 81
  • 1988 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • modifying to a specific amount a portion of a circuit court’s equalization award because that portion of the judgment resulted from an easily traceable mathematical error
  • applying the “manifest error” standard to a motion for reconsideration under § 805.17(3)
  • applying the “manifest error” standard to a motion for reconsideration under § 805.17(3)
  • The \value was not in dispute at trial. It was this amount which [wife] requested be awarded to her by use of a QDRO . . . .\
  • “[A]n issue must be raised in the [circuit] court to be eligible for review upon appeal.”
  • \ [Generally the assets of a marriage are to be valued and divided as of the date of the divorce. Special circumstances can warrant deviation from this rule.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott, Brown, Nettesheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.