Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abuses its discretion when it sets support in a manner that is against logic and the facts in the record
• noting that reviewing court may only find abuse of discretion when trial court reaches “clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record”
• noting that reviewing court may only find abuse of discretion when trial court reaches \clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record\
• stating that resolving matter in manner contrary to logic and facts on record constitutes abuse of discretion
• stating that a district court abuses its discretion when a conclusion is against logic and the facts in the record
• stating that a district court abuses its discretion when its resolution of a matter is “against logic and the facts on record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).