· 8/28/1996
Marriage of Roberts v. Roberts
Citations
- 670 N.E.2d 72
- 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1144
- 1996 WL 488051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that whereas “Indiana does not permit a degree to be included as marital property,” student loans are “properly considered as part of the marital estate”
- funding of husband’s law degree not dissipation even though wife did not receive any benefit
- money expended in order to secure law degree was not dissipated even though other spouse did not receive benefits expected therefrom
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrard, Baker, Darden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.