Skip to main content
· 8/28/1996

Marriage of Roberts v. Roberts

Citations

  • 670 N.E.2d 72
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1144
  • 1996 WL 488051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that whereas “Indiana does not permit a degree to be included as marital property,” student loans are “properly considered as part of the marital estate”
  • funding of husband’s law degree not dissipation even though wife did not receive any benefit
  • money expended in order to secure law degree was not dissipated even though other spouse did not receive benefits expected therefrom

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Baker, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.