Marriage of Rask v. Rask

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court erred by including mortgage payment in wife’s monthly expenses when record contained no evidence “concerning when or whether” wife would begin incurring mortgage expense
• concluding that award consuming 54% of the obligor’s net monthly income is unreasonably high
• affirming a conduct-based attorney fee award where it had “some support in the record”
• reversing a district court’s inclusion in a maintenance recipient’s expenses of an expense when “[t]here [was] no evidence in the record concerning when respondent will begin incurring this expense, or whether she ever will”
• considering interest on prudent investments within spousal-maintenance analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).