Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a portion of property was nonmarital where party identified the value of the property at the time of the marriage
• stating that appreciation is passive when “no investment decisions are made, and neither [spouse] may withdraw the funds or otherwise control the investments”
• stating that appellate courts leave credibility determinations to fact-finder when reviewing evidence regarding spousal maintenance
• stating that appellate courts leave credibility determinations to fact-finder when reviewing evidence regarding spousal maintenance
• stating that “[w]e may treat statutory factors as addressed when they are implicit in the findings. . .”
• noting that a district court’s compliance with factual-findings requirements can be implicit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).