Marriage of Peterka v. Peterka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that specific findings on all statutory maintenance factors are not necessarily required “if the findings that were made reflect that the district court adequately considered the relevant statutory factors”
• affirming rejection of request for attorney fees because much of the attorney-fee liability was the product of unnecessary litigation that did not rise to the level of good faith
• district court did not abuse its discretion when it “resolved the issue in a logical manner consistent with the facts on the record.”
• “A finding of a maintenance obligor’s ability to pay maintenance is required to support an award of maintenance.” (citing Stich v. Stich, 435 N.W.2d 52, 53 (Minn. 1989))
• applying Wilson in a family law appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).