Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding a 62% - 38% split because, in light of the parties’ “relatively equal contributions to the marriage” and one party’s unemployment, medical problems, and greater needs, it was “inequitable”
• applying the Taylor holding to a mature pension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).