Marriage of Larkin v. Larkin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that concepts of duty, breach, causation and damages are present in both negligent and strict liability failure to warn claims under Maryland law
• observing that failure to warn claim requires proof of defective condition or hidden risk in product that caused injury
• noting that there is no duty to warn of obvious or commonly-known dangers
• “Warnings given to consumers are effective when the consumer is informed of a way in which the product can be used that nullifies or mitigates the risk.”
• \Warnings given to consumers are effective when the consumer is informed of a way in which the product can be used that nullifies or mitigates the risk.\
• “Certainly, it is true that a strict liability claim based on failure to warn bears a strong resemblance to a claim of negligence. Concepts of duty, breach, causation, and damages are present in both.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).