Marriage of Kyle v. Kyle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that SSI benefits received by a disabled child “are intended to supplement other income, not substitute for it” because “Congress determined that disabled children generally have greater needs than nondisabled children”
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering the father to pay a share of work-related summer child care “provided for outside the guideline computation” where the cost of the care was unknown at the time of the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).