Marriage of Kroening v. Kroening

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating parties’ financial disparity was “large” when “[obligor] received liquid assets and ha[d] a high earning capacity” and “[obligee] received nonliquid assets in the property settlement and ha[d] a fairly low earning potential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).