Marriage of Julie C. v. Andrew C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, “when the trial court increased Father’s parenting time to seven overnight stays during any given two-week period, it ordered a de facto modification of custody to joint physical custody”
• noting that the legislature amended the statute in 1994 to remove requirement of unreasonableness
• explaining that custody modification statute was amended in 1994 to remove requirement of unreasonableness, and stating, “Thus, a petitioner is no longer required to show that an existing custody order is unreasonable before a court will modify it.”
• affirming grant of joint legal custody where one parent testified that parties “communicate best through email and respond fairly promptly to each other”
• discussing joint legal custody in a dissolution proceeding, under Indiana Code section 31- 17-2-15
• discussing joint legal custody in a dissolution proceeding, under Indiana Code section 31-17-2-15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).