Marriage of Janssen v. Janssen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nonvested, unmatured pension benefits are marital property, even though the receipt and value of such benefits depend on post-marital labor and the benefits were not received until after the dissolution
• holding that unvested, unmatured pension benefit is martial property
• interpreting \marital property\ expansively, as not to ignore the presumption that \each spouse contributed to the acquisition of property while they lived together as husband and wife\
• instructing courts to retain jurisdiction because the “administrative burden [was] not insuperable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).