Skip to main content
· 9/25/1984

Marriage of Hill v. Hill

Citations

  • 356 N.W.2d 49
  • 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding validity of antenuptial agreement but finding that the maintenance provision was unconscionable under Minnesota law given the wife’s poor health, emotional problems, and lack of earning capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.