Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if no rule to show cause is issued in compliance with Ind. Code section 34- 47-3-5, then a person may not be held in indirect contempt
• noting that one problem with the trial court's contempt order was that it did not indicate the manner in which the husband could purge himself of the contempt
• noting that one problem with the trial court’s con tempt order was that it did not indicate the manner in which the husband could purge himself of the contempt
• reversing finding of contempt and noting that the court's order did not indicate how the appellant could purge himself of the contempt
• reversing finding of contempt and noting that the court’s order did not indicate how the appellant could purge himself of the contempt
• reversing finding of contempt and noting that the court’s order did not indicate how the appellant could purge himself of the contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).