Skip to main content
· 4/22/1986

Marriage of Doering v. Doering

Citations

  • 385 N.W.2d 387
  • 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court’s decision to base its valuation on one party’s estimate was not clearly erroneous
  • affirming the district court’s resolution of conflicting testimony regarding the amount of a party’s nonmarital interest in the homestead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.