· 4/22/1986
Marriage of Doering v. Doering
Citations
- 385 N.W.2d 387
- 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court’s decision to base its valuation on one party’s estimate was not clearly erroneous
- affirming the district court’s resolution of conflicting testimony regarding the amount of a party’s nonmarital interest in the homestead
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.