Marriage of Dean v. Pelton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court was “not making true findings” by merely repeating the parties’ arguments
• concluding that findings were inadequate when “the [district] court preface[d] its statements with phrases such as ‘petitioner claims,’ ‘according to petitioner’s application,’ and ‘respondent asserts’” and did not affirmatively state its findings as findings of the court
• stating that a district court’s recitation of the parties’ factual assertions “is not making true findings” because findings “must be affirmatively stated as findings of the trial court”
• stating that a district court’s recitation of the parties’ assertions “is not making true findings” because findings of fact “must be affirmatively stated as findings of the trial court”
• stating that findings “must be affirmatively stated as findings of the trial court” and that “the trial court is not making true findings [by] merely reciting the parties’ claims”
• stating that merely reciting the parties’ assertions does not constitute making findings of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).