Skip to main content
· 2/18/1986

Marriage of Clark v. Atkins

Citations

  • 489 N.E.2d 90
  • 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 2361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that order awarding attorney’s fees was not final judgment because amount of fees had not been set
  • explaining that even when “the questions raised concerning [an underlying] order are constitutional in nature,” contempt proceedings cannot be used for a collateral attack
  • rejecting mothers argument that her minor children's refusal to visit their father justified her noncompliance with a visitation order
  • rejecting mother’s argument that her minor children’s refusal to visit their father justified her noncompliance with a visitation order
  • rejecting mother’s argument that her minor children’s refusal to visit their father justified her noncompliance with a visitation order
  • affirming a finding of contempt when a mother did not require the children to visit with their father, rejecting the contemptuous mother’s argument that her minor children’s refusal to visit their father justified her noncompliance with a visitation order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrard, Staton, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.