Skip to main content
· 4/26/1983

Marriage of Barnett v. Barnett

Citations

  • 447 N.E.2d 1172
  • 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 2849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in modifying custody considering a number of factors including the relative stability of the parents
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in modifying custody considering a number of factors including the relative stability of the parents
  • “[A]ssuming, arguendo, that the court had in mind reasons other than malice in awarding appellate fees, he still committed error in not conducting an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Robertson, Ratliff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.