Skip to main content
· 6/6/1991

Marriage of Aldinger v. Aldinger

Citations

  • 813 P.2d 836
  • 15 Brief Times Rptr. 773
  • 1991 Colo. App. LEXIS 167
  • 1991 WL 95902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the more demanding standard helps prevent “the filing of motions to modify each time there is any change in the earning ability or needs of a party”
  • considering a motion to modify under the same standards as an original award would give no real meaning to the modification statute
  • motions to modify must be considered under a more limited standard than an original award, because otherwise section 14-10-122 would have no meaning and parties would file motions to modify each time there is a change in their earning ability or needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pierce, Dubofsky, Silverstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.