Marria v. Broaddus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that banning members of particular faith from congregating or having religious literature violated RLUIPA
• indicating the sincerity and religious nature of plaintiff’s beliefs are issues of fact
• applying Turner’s “reasonable relation” test and RLUIPA’s “compelling interest” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).