Marrero Ex Rel. Tabalas v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that such matters are “exclusively within the purview of the General Assembly’s powers, and they are not subject to intervention by the judicial branch of our government”
• stating the Commonwealth Court’s reasoning “discloses no error, but rather a conscientious adherence to precedent”
• denying declaratory relief because the determination of quality “is delegated to . . . sound legislative discretion”
• stating the Commonwealth Court’s reasoning “discloses no error, but rather a conscientious adherence to precedent”
• construing article III, § 14, of Pennsylvania constitution providing that General Assembly is to \provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• construing article III, § 14, of Pennsylvania constitution providing that General Assembly is to “provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of public education” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).