Marrale v. Gwinnett Place Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “in most cases a jury question is presented on whether a buyer acted promptly to rescind the contract”
• reversing grant of summary judgment on car buyer’s FBPA claim when a salesman “certainly knew that he did not know the real condition of the car,” but told a buyer nonetheless that the car had not been in a collision
• reversing grant of summary judgment on car buyer’s FBPA claim when a salesman “certainly knew that he did not know the real condition of the car,” but told a buyer nonetheless that the car had not been in a collision
• in light of salesman’s lack of knowledge as to a car’s actual condition, his mispresentation that it “had never been in an accident” could amount to fraud under OCGA § 51-6-2 (b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).