Skip to main content
· 7/3/1996

Marraccini v. Bertelsmann

Citations

  • 221 A.D.2d 95
  • 644 N.Y.S.2d 875
  • 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing an implied-in-fact contract claim on the pleadings because there were open-ended terms, and industry standards that plaintiff claimed could fill them were not identified
  • finding idea of new cable music channel on which artists would promote music, fashion lines, accessories and merchandise not novel as a creative variation on a theme already in the public domain
  • concept for music video cable television channel, with the marketing of associated merchandise by means of home shopping not novel and original idea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.