· 5/14/1964
Marr v. Thornton
Citations
- 392 P.2d 458
- 237 Or. 503
- 1964 Ore. LEXIS 388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deleting phrase `right-to-work' from ballot title caption as slogan that amounted to argument for measure and that likely would create prejudice
- deleting phrase ‘right-to-work’ from ballot title caption as slogan that amounted to argument for measure and that likely would create prejudice
- deleting phrase \right-to-work\ from ballot title caption as slogan that amounted to argument for measure and that likely would create prejudice
- deleting phrase “right-to-work” from ballot title caption as slogan that amounted to argument for measure and that likely would create prejudice
- “right-to-work” phrase in caption impermissible, because it was a “slogan” that did not fairly describe the measure and was “likely to create prejudice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mgallister, McAllister, Rossman, Perry, Sloan, O'Connell, Goodwin, Denecke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.