Skip to main content

Marquez, Stephen Anthony v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the regulatory framework of the Railroad Commission . . . is of no consequence to the interpretation of an unambiguous agreement.”
  • noting that contracting parties “are presumed to know the law and to have stated their agreement in light of it”
  • clause reserved \portion of said lease included within the proration or pooled unit of each well\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.