Marquez Ex Rel. Estate of Marquez v. Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it refused 16 to consider unsworn witness statements submitted in response to a motion for 17 summary judgment
• “The existence and scope of duty, as questions of law, should not be scrutinized with such specificity that the factual issue of negligence is subsumed.”
• “The existence and scope of duty, as questions of law, should not be scrutinized with such specificity that the factual issue of negligence is subsumed.”
• “Even if the basic material facts are undisputed, if equally logical, but 7 conflicting, reasonable inferences can be drawn from these facts, an award of 8 summary judgment is improper.”
• “Even if the basic material facts are undisputed, if equally logical, but 10 conflicting, reasonable inferences can be drawn from these facts, an award of 11 summary judgment is improper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).