Marnine v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disregarding for summary judgment purposes expert testimony that “simply recite[d] the familiar function/way/result test and conclude[d] that the [accused product] infringe[d] the [asserted] patent by the doctrine of equivalents, without further analysis or explanation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).