Marmon Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the doctrine applies when: “(1) a final judgment on the merits in a prior suit involving (2) the same parties or their privies and (3) a subsequent suit based on the same cause of action.” (internal quotations omitted)
• finding no error where the Board confirmed an award of benefits on a survivor’s subsequent claim as of the month after the survivor’s prior claim became final
• explaining that three elements are required for res judicata to apply: “(1) a final judgment on the merits in a prior suit involving (2) the same parties or their privies and (3) a subsequent suit based on the same cause of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that three elements are required for res judicata to apply: “(1) a final judgment on the merits in a prior suit involving (2) the same parties or their privies and (3) a subsequent suit based on the same cause of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that three elements are required for res judicata to apply: “(1) a final judgment on the merits in a prior suit involving (2) the same parties or their privies and (3) a subsequent suit based on the same cause of action.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reciting the three required elements for claim preclusion to apply: “(1) a final judgment on the merits in a prior suit involving (2) the same parties or their privies and (3) a subsequent suit based on the same cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).