Marmon Atlanta Co., Inc., of Georgia v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is “ALJ’s function to resolve conflicts among the various treating and examining physicians”
• noting that an “ALJ may reject the conclusions of any medical expert, whether hired by a claimant or by the government, if inconsistent with the medical record as a whole.”
• discussing that an “ALJ may reject the conclusions of any medical expert, whether hired by a claimant or by the government, if [the conclusions are] inconsistent with the medical record as a whole”
• finding the ALJ properly discredited claimant’s limitations as he attempted to return to work for his former company and applied for jobs both similar and unrelated to his previous employment
• “Where the medical evidence is equally balanced, as we find it is here, the ALJ resolves the conflict.”
• absence of prescription medicine, failure to seek medical treatment, claimant’s record of applying for jobs, and inconsistent medical reports was substantial evidence supporting ALJ’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).