Skip to main content
· 9/12/1978

Marmah, Inc. v. Town of Greenwich

Citations

  • 176 Conn. 116
  • 405 A.2d 63
  • 1978 Conn. LEXIS 1014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it inequitable to allow amended zoning regulations to act as a bar where the trial court could reasonably conclude that the change was enacted primarily to prevent plaintiff from building the project
  • explaining that “the trial court could reasonably conclude that this zoning amendment was enacted primarily for the purpose of preventing the plaintiff from going forward with its contemplated building project”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bogdanski, Cotter, Loiselle, Longo, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.