Skip to main content
· 11/23/2005

Marmac, LLC v. Reed

Citations

  • 232 F.R.D. 409
  • 2006 A.M.C. 375
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31375
  • 2005 WL 3133472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying abatement in Hurricane Ike proceeding where EUO requested after suit was filed, characterizing Rule 30 deposition as the functional equivalent to EUO
  • denying abatement in Hurricane Ike proceeding where EUO requested after suit was filed, characterizing Rule 30 deposition as the functional equivalent to EUO
  • denying a motion to abate based on the failure of an insured to submit to an examination under oath where the insurer requested the examination after the inception of suit
  • denying a motion to abate based on the failure of an insured to submit to an examination under oath where the insurer requested the examination after the inception of suit
  • denying a motion to abate based on the failure of an insured to submit to an examination under oath where the insurer requested the examination after the inception of suit
  • denying a motion to abate based on the failure of an insured to submit to an examination under oath where the insurer requested the examination after the inception of suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Presnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.