Skip to main content
· 4/28/2023

Marlowe v. Marlowe

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1417

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., the trial court did not abuse its discretion by naming father the residential parent and legal custodian of the parties' minor children. The trial court considered all statutory factors and implicitly considered mother's role as the children's primary caregiver. The trial court's factual findings were supported by some competent, credible evidence in the record, so they were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.