Marlowe v. Coakley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff adequately alleged closed-ended continuity because the activity had lasted ten years
• finding the requisite continuity established only by the ten-year duration of the defendants' fraudulent conduct
• finding the pattern element met where the complaint alleged a ten-year scheme to defraud plaintiffs
• “What constitutes a ‘substantial’ duration must of course remain a matter for case-by-case determination.”
• reversing dismissal where complaint alleged 10-year scheme to defraud plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).